<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Monitors on Carl Lieberman</title><link>https://carl.ac/tags/monitors/</link><description>Recent content in Monitors on Carl Lieberman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://carl.ac/tags/monitors/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>(Finally) Buying a Good Monitor: Adventures in Hedonism and Native 4K</title><link>https://carl.ac/4k-monitor/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://carl.ac/4k-monitor/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;
I built my first computer about a decade ago and can still rattle off all of its components.
Gigabyte EP45-UD3R, Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550, nVidia GTX 260 216 Core, 8 GB of OCZ Reaper DDR2 1066 RAM, a Western Digital 500 GB 7200 RPM hard drive, Creative Fatal1ty sound card, Antec 1200 case&lt;sup class="footnote-reference"&gt;&lt;a id="footnote-reference-1" href="#footnote-1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, 750 watt Corsair power supply, Lite-On 48x DVD-RW drive.
I had no fewer than three Razer products whose names I will pretend not to remember.
But even though I looked at it way longer than any other component, I couldn&amp;#39;t tell you the monitor I had.
It was a 1680x1050 flatscreen somewhere in the 22&amp;#34; to 24&amp;#34; range, and it was bad, but that&amp;#39;s all I know.
I just treated it as a necessary evil that took budget away from the real computer, like a Windows Vista license.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>